<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Webjam 2008 Session &#8211; Email Design 101</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.mailchimp.com/webjam-2008-session-email-design-101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/webjam-2008-session-email-design-101/</link> <description>MailChimp, email marketing, and monkeys!</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Paul</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/webjam-2008-session-email-design-101/#comment-1778</link> <dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:12:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/?p=1129#comment-1778</guid> <description>Thanks for the response, Ben. I&#039;m just about to setup and start playing with a test account to try out the things I&#039;d need to do with our lists as I look for alternatives to our existing provider. This saves me having to actually run through that part of the testing process!And no, we don&#039;t use link tracking in our plain text, for just the reason you mention. Although with the proliferation of people reading text-only on their handhelds, I&#039;m starting to think I may be missing a significant number of &quot;opens&quot; compared to when nobody read their email on Blackberries.Is there anything in the works to provide an alternate tracking method for text-only?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the response, Ben. I&#8217;m just about to setup and start playing with a test account to try out the things I&#8217;d need to do with our lists as I look for alternatives to our existing provider. This saves me having to actually run through that part of the testing process!</p><p>And no, we don&#8217;t use link tracking in our plain text, for just the reason you mention. Although with the proliferation of people reading text-only on their handhelds, I&#8217;m starting to think I may be missing a significant number of &#8220;opens&#8221; compared to when nobody read their email on Blackberries.</p><p>Is there anything in the works to provide an alternate tracking method for text-only?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben Chestnut</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/webjam-2008-session-email-design-101/#comment-1771</link> <dc:creator>Ben Chestnut</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:09:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/?p=1129#comment-1771</guid> <description>@paul - Yes, you&#039;re exactly right. We count it as an &quot;open&quot; if someone clicks a tracked link in the campaign. This also works if you track clicks in your plain-text email (altho few people actually do this, because tracker URLs are in plain sight in plain-text emails). If you have the A.I.M. add-on module installed in your MailChimp acct, we can tell you who it was that clicked.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@paul &#8211; Yes, you&#8217;re exactly right. We count it as an &#8220;open&#8221; if someone clicks a tracked link in the campaign. This also works if you track clicks in your plain-text email (altho few people actually do this, because tracker URLs are in plain sight in plain-text emails). If you have the A.I.M. add-on module installed in your MailChimp acct, we can tell you who it was that clicked.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/webjam-2008-session-email-design-101/#comment-1770</link> <dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:40:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/?p=1129#comment-1770</guid> <description>Some useful links in there, even for those of us who didn&#039;t get anywhere near the WebJam session. (Boy, I wish we could get some of these kinds of events going in Western Canada!)A quick question that came up when reading your &quot;How open, click tracking works in email marketing&quot; that I&#039;ve been wondering for awhile and to which I haven&#039;t been able to find a definitive response.If a recipient opens an email with image display disabled, they will not register as an open. But what if they click on a tracked link in that message? Obviously the click will be counted, since it&#039;s tracked, but will the click also trigger an &quot;open&quot;? (Since obviously the message had to be opened to click.)I realise the open couldn&#039;t be attributed to that click, (since there&#039;s no individual user ID associated with the click tracking) but would MailChimp have a way increment the open rate for that campaign?Paul</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some useful links in there, even for those of us who didn&#8217;t get anywhere near the WebJam session. (Boy, I wish we could get some of these kinds of events going in Western Canada!)</p><p>A quick question that came up when reading your &#8220;How open, click tracking works in email marketing&#8221; that I&#8217;ve been wondering for awhile and to which I haven&#8217;t been able to find a definitive response.</p><p>If a recipient opens an email with image display disabled, they will not register as an open. But what if they click on a tracked link in that message? Obviously the click will be counted, since it&#8217;s tracked, but will the click also trigger an &#8220;open&#8221;? (Since obviously the message had to be opened to click.)</p><p>I realise the open couldn&#8217;t be attributed to that click, (since there&#8217;s no individual user ID associated with the click tracking) but would MailChimp have a way increment the open rate for that campaign?</p><p>Paul</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/webjam-2008-session-email-design-101/#comment-1768</link> <dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:45:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/?p=1129#comment-1768</guid> <description>Update: Ken Seals has posted some very compelling evidence as to who chimpnapped freddie. If you read the comments, you&#039;ll see there&#039;s possibly a Bronto and CampaignMonitor tie-in here:http://www.kennethseals.com/2008/10/onwired-has-the-mailchimp/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: Ken Seals has posted some very compelling evidence as to who chimpnapped freddie. If you read the comments, you&#8217;ll see there&#8217;s possibly a Bronto and CampaignMonitor tie-in here:</p><p><a href="http://www.kennethseals.com/2008/10/onwired-has-the-mailchimp/" rel="nofollow">http://www.kennethseals.com/2008/10/onwired-has-the-mailchimp/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 240/241 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.mailchimp.com @ 2012-02-09 18:01:04 -->
