<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Using Twitter To Rate Email Campaign Effectiveness</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.mailchimp.com/using-twitter-to-rate-email-campaign-effectiveness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/using-twitter-to-rate-email-campaign-effectiveness/</link> <description>MailChimp, email marketing, and monkeys!</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: ShaynaCat</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/using-twitter-to-rate-email-campaign-effectiveness/#comment-46829</link> <dc:creator>ShaynaCat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:55:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/?p=3677#comment-46829</guid> <description>As long as the company&#039;s Twitter followers don&#039;t all follow lots of other people, and are actually on Twitter at the time the tweet goes out, this may well be a great indicator - but I can say from wrist-aching experience that those who get a lot of @ replies never even see most tweets, RTs or otherwise, that aren&#039;t sent directly to them by name.Not only does it get very time-consuming answering replies, but the main timeline goes by at such dizzy speed that which other tweets I get the chance to read is just a lottery.The trick is to persuade your followers to add you to their &quot;Best Friends&quot; screen on TweetDeck (or whatever equivalent they might be using) so that your tweet&#039;s effectively promoted above the rest.The question is, though, how, exactly, you can DO that...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as the company&#8217;s Twitter followers don&#8217;t all follow lots of other people, and are actually on Twitter at the time the tweet goes out, this may well be a great indicator &#8211; but I can say from wrist-aching experience that those who get a lot of @ replies never even see most tweets, RTs or otherwise, that aren&#8217;t sent directly to them by name.</p><p>Not only does it get very time-consuming answering replies, but the main timeline goes by at such dizzy speed that which other tweets I get the chance to read is just a lottery.</p><p>The trick is to persuade your followers to add you to their &#8220;Best Friends&#8221; screen on TweetDeck (or whatever equivalent they might be using) so that your tweet&#8217;s effectively promoted above the rest.</p><p>The question is, though, how, exactly, you can DO that&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kathi Rabil</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/using-twitter-to-rate-email-campaign-effectiveness/#comment-5917</link> <dc:creator>Kathi Rabil</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:40:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/?p=3677#comment-5917</guid> <description>Good article showing how to compare email campaigns with Twitter activity.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article showing how to compare email campaigns with Twitter activity.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stefan</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/using-twitter-to-rate-email-campaign-effectiveness/#comment-5164</link> <dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:54:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/?p=3677#comment-5164</guid> <description>Very nice article! Thnx for sharing!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice article! Thnx for sharing!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Caroline Maddox</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/using-twitter-to-rate-email-campaign-effectiveness/#comment-4402</link> <dc:creator>Caroline Maddox</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:45:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/?p=3677#comment-4402</guid> <description>Great article on tracking sales and e-mail marketing. Will look to introduce this to our marketing metrics.Caroline</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article on tracking sales and e-mail marketing. Will look to introduce this to our marketing metrics.</p><p>Caroline</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Using Twitter To Rate Email Campaign Effectiveness</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/using-twitter-to-rate-email-campaign-effectiveness/#comment-4194</link> <dc:creator>Using Twitter To Rate Email Campaign Effectiveness</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:27:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/?p=3677#comment-4194</guid> <description>[...] upon this while doing some research and thought that others might find it of interest too...  Using Twitter To Rate Email Campaign Effectiveness    It offers some nice insight into product sales via email VS [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] upon this while doing some research and thought that others might find it of interest too&#8230;  Using Twitter To Rate Email Campaign Effectiveness    It offers some nice insight into product sales via email VS [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 251/252 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.mailchimp.com @ 2012-02-09 19:19:03 -->
