Q: “I have a list of 9,000 customer email addresses. I haven’t emailed them in a while, and now I’m ready to start sending them email newsletters. How can I do this without getting blacklisted, or angering my customers?”
A: Very carefully. If these recipients haven’t heard from you in a long time, chances are they already forgot opting in. Or, your emails just aren’t relevant to them anymore. And just because they bought something from you 5 years ago, it doesn’t mean they want to get email newsletters from you today. The chances are very high that they’ll click that nasty “this is spam” button in their email program. If only a handful of recipients click that button, some ISPs will start blocking all future emails from your company.
So you’ve got to be extremely careful. Here’s some advice we gave someone yesterday, who asked us this very question:
- Send a “Re-introduction” campaign. The tone of the email is the most important factor here. Think more “Letter from the president” than “Boy, have we got an offer for you!!!!”
- In that email, try to remind them how you got their contact information. If they’ve purchased something from your site, or if they’ve opted in, put that in your message. Got an order ID? Name of the product they bought? Mail-merge it in.
- Give an incentive to stay opted-in. If I did business with you years ago, why would i want to do business with you again?
- Send the re-introduction campaign to very small chunks of your list. Don’t just blast one message to 9,000 people. Break it into smaller lists of 1,000 or 2,000. And why not spread it out over several days? That way, you can watch for abuse complaints, and tweak content for maximum effectiveness.
So check this out.
This morning, I received an email (out of the blue) from Modern Postcard. I haven’t heard from them in years. How’d they do it?
Waaaaaay back when we started MailChimp in 2001, I made postcards (the paper
kind), and mailed them out (the snail-mail kind, not email) to a list of
creative directors and ad agencies that I purchased from D&B
Online. I did it all through ModernPostcard’s website. I think I sent 250 pieces or so,
and got about 3 customers out of it. One of those customers has been with us for
years, and has more than paid for that campaign, so I was pleased.
Overall, it was pretty nice using Modern Postcard. Well worth it.
But I haven’t printed anymore postcards, or heard anything else from them since then.
I think their “Re-introduction” email does a perfect job (click to zoom in):
Keep in mind it’s early morning, I’ve got my giant coffee mug in my left hand, and I’m using my right hand to click on emails in my inbox and mark them as spam. It’s like this every morning: spam, spam, spam, spam, save for later. spam, spam, spam, spam, save for later.
Here’s what convinced me to open Modern Postcard’s email:
The From (“Sender”) field: They put their company name in it. I remember using them, so I know it’s not a stranger.
The Subject line: It’s not overly spammy, and it also has their company name in it.
Here’s what convinced me to sign up, and not just delete it forever:
It’s not bright and jazzy and slick (overly sales-y). And coming from a postcard printing company, you know it must have been hard for them to hold back on that. They knew that this should be more “letter from the president” than anything else. I have no idea if Blake Miller is actually their president, but this email sure looks like it. This is more polite, and it makes me feel like they know what they’re doing, and they’re not just going to send me tons of crap every other day (I hope).
Incentive to stay: I’ll get a free PDF if I sign up. Hey, I’m a sucker for PDFs.
Would love to hear from Modern Postcard on how much of their list they actually retained after this campaign. When we’ve done this for clients in the past, we’ve seen their lists get reduced by about 50%.
Just in case you’re curious, here’s a screenshot of the landing page (if you click the “sign up” link):
I think the checkboxes are a nice touch.
First of all, they’re not pre-checked. If they were, I would have left the page immediately out of disgust (or at least rolled my eyes in disdain). Second of all, checkboxes make people stop and read. And when I read what they were offering, I liked what I saw.



[...] If you have an old list of people who opted-in to receive emails from you, but you haven’t sent them an email in a really long time (or ever), then you need to delete any emails older than 1yr, then send the remaining subscribers a “remember me?” welcome email. Here’s a good example. [...]
I have a question about one of your tips.
“Send a “Re-introduction” campaign. The tone of the email is the most important factor here. Think more “Letter from the president” than “Boy, have we got an offer for you!!!!”"
What if the Re-introductions get you spam reports? You did mention that you should send it to a small number of people and over a few days, but that could easily get you 1 or 2 spam report, correct?
Very good article and enlightening
Great article, and I like that you tie it in with a real example.
I had the same question Naz had — what if you get spam complaints? But I guess that’s the lowest risk option.
One or two complaints won’t hurt you. Even so, I’d break it up into small campaigns, like Naz mentions. Then, use any spam complaints as research to help improve the next batch of re-intro emails:
http://blog.mailchimp.com/spam-complaints-your-own-focus-group/
I’m confused.
-Ben Says “One or two complaints won’t hurt you”
-The artice above says “Don’t just blast one message to 9,000 people. Break it into smaller lists of 1,000 or 2,000″
and
-”If you send Emails to a list, and you get an unusual amount of SPAM complaints (more than 1 out of 1,000), ISPs will begin blocking future emails from your company. They will also request (that’s putting it mildly) that MailChimp shut down your account.” ” and “If only a handful of recipients click that button, some ISPs will start blocking all future emails from your company”
It seems that 1 in 1,000 is a VERY low thresh hold, and Ben’s comment above is actually WRONG, 1 or 2 will get you in trouble if you’re sending in small batches of 1,000-2,000.
Can you explain if this number of 1-2 per 1,000-2,000 is an average or live count? For example, what if I send 10,000 emails and in the 1,000 that go out, 3 people mark it as spam. This could mean that I have 3 per 1,000 and per the rules should be blocked. Or it could mean I have 3 per 10,000 total in the mailing and per the rules it’s not a problem. Please explain exactly how that is figured out.
I have the same question as Ron.
I have an old email list from more than 25,000 subscribers. The company went dead due to a nasty fight between partners and at the end I got the email list and some other perks, but can’t use the company name anymore, so I’m feeling frustrated here because I have a bunch of opt-ins and can’t send them an invitation to join the new one without being flagged as spam.
So, if I try to send about a 1000 and a 100 of them where pals from my ex-partner then I’m doomed….
I guess I’d rather start over building the list all over again.
Can’t help but notice there was never a response to Ron’s query. I have a similar query.
Thoughts?
Yea I was about to sign up until I read the Terms and Conditions and the above statements. Some people are just mean and will hit that spam button even though my newsletters and announcements have a statement on the top that they opted in for the newsletter or announcement. In this age of newsletters and with the ability to opt out automatically, I can’t believe the threshold for spam of 1 or 1000 is so low. I see no dates on these posts, are they real? Really, only 7 posts?
I think we all have the same questions, and like Michael said, some people just hit the spam bottom, and some others don’t realize how they hurt us when they do that, and others they were referred by a friend and they mark us as spam, so there’s a lot of ways that we can be blocked.
and yes I am confused too, ” one or two wont hurt’ so is there anybody updating this post? are they too busy for potential clients? customer service is a top priority!
Mailchimp hasn’t responded to any of these great questions since Feb. 2009— almost 2 years! *yikes*
This is a pretty old blog post. The same discussion took place again in the comments here:
http://blog.mailchimp.com/research-spammy-email-design-mistakes/#comments
I believe it was a good discussion with lots of feedback from customers and from MailChimp.
Hey Ben,
This is an old blog post, but it’s linked directly in your Terms of Use (section 11d).
You might want to update that link or be prepared to continue to receive queries on this one.
Regards,
Alastair.
Ah, that would explain things. Thanks.
One way to handle:
1. Clean up your list.
2. Send one last email to your list from the address/site you have already been using, which is already familiar to recipients. Use the tips mentioned above so it’s not too spam-y/sales-y.
3. Subject line – ‘Remain on this list? If NO, Please respond – thank you.’
4. Text – explain you’re moving list to MailChimp & only want to include recipients still interested.
5. Explain how they got on your list initially & ask for response ONLY if they want to be removed.
6. Give MailChimp’s web link to add to their list of approved senders.
This enables you to clean up your list BEFORE importing to MailChimp & hopefully avoiding the spam issues. Just heard about MailChimp from a fellow musician, can’t wait to start using it!
Thanks Karen,
That was helpful.
There seems to be a lot of people who think 1 in 1000 is really low considering the junk button is “just a button” to most email users.
I got my fingers smacked because I had 5 “reports” out of a list of 530 emails. They were all HOTMAIL accounts.
What could this mean?
I would love to see the examples referenced in this article, but the images will not open. Does anyone have any ideas on how I can view these?
Oh my. Yes, this is a very, very old blog post, from the days when we used TypePad. We’ve since switched to WordPress, and recently let our TypePad account expire (because we found some customers got confused, thinking we’d still respond to comments on the old blog). Unfortunately, all those images are probably permanently gone. Darn! It was *such* a good example, too.
Similar to the people above, I’m a bit confused about the lack of images and lack of responses to peoples questions. I just got an email from Mailchimp support suggesting that I read this post. Today is 8th Feb 2011 and they’re telling me to read a 4year old post with the images missing. Weird!
This page is also linked to in the “Is my list OK to use in MailChimp” grid. You should update the links on the site if you want us to stop coming here.
I agree… old post and still getting here from a mailchimp email. This should be up to date and an enforced reading when signing up to mailchimp which is such a great service. regards!
I, too, was sent here from a link in a message from MailChimp support just recently. It is a good post, so I see why they keep sending people here, but I really wish they would dig up the images and re-post them somewhere for us.
Ditto to Roberta. Was sent here by Brad from MailChimp Support today.
Since we shut down the old blog, we lost those images forever. Google actually had a cached version of 2 images, but only the thumbnails. I inserted those above, but you unfortunately can’t get a zoomed in view. I think the gist of it all was that the Modern Postcard email was not fancy at all. It was written more like a personal letter, on official (and instantly recognizable) letterhead. I hope that helps a little.
So Ben – Are we really always held to a .01% rate and if so is that not far too restrictive given that mistaken “mark this as spam” selections do often occur and/or mean spirited types (that clearly remember opting in) will hit the “mark this as spam” anyway? It’s worrisome that only .01% can spell the end of your email campaign regardless of your expressed concern, attention to detail and relevance. There is easily 1 in 100 forgetful, mistaken, nutty or even mean types in this world. Are we done before we ever get started? Warranted Fear?
I’m new to this whole e-marketing thing and fresh out of college. I REALLY like the re-introduction text from Modern Postcard, is it ethical for me to tweak this to our needs and send it as ours? Or is that plagiarizing if I don’t have the appropriate permissions from Modern Postcard?
I would read it, get the gist of it, then totally re-write it in your company’s voice instead.
My question relates to being a sole trader/contractor and customers had to give us an email address for their invoice/receipt to be sent to. Does this mean when we start our own company, we are able to send a re introduction type email to those customers to advise them that as their previous repairer, we have new contact details and offer them the opt in or unsubscribe?
No, in that case you would not have permission to send them marketing emails, or to use MailChimp to contact them.
So you’re saying you started MailChimp in 2001 (prior to the CAN-Spam law) using a purchased list and sending unsolicited mail to people? Hmmmmmm…
Heh. They were snail-mail postcards, where the sender bears the cost of delivery. In email (as well as fax), the recipient bears some cost, which is what makes unsolicited bulk email so much more repulsive than snail mail.