<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Prankster Pollutes Obama’s E-mail List</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/</link> <description>MailChimp, email marketing, and monkeys!</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ben</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-26669</link> <dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:22:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-26669</guid> <description>Some people are offended that they&#039;ve been added to a marketing list without permission, and now it&#039;s *their* job to click unsubscribe. I kinda feel the same way. I get these emails and say, &quot;How dare you make *me* clean your list for you?&quot; And there&#039;s always the risk that the recipient doesn&#039;t receive the confirmation email due to a spam filter (same risk as sending DOI confirmations).  There&#039;s no really easy way around it. It&#039;s hard work keeping stuff clean (email lists are no exception).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people are offended that they&#8217;ve been added to a marketing list without permission, and now it&#8217;s *their* job to click unsubscribe. I kinda feel the same way. I get these emails and say, &#8220;How dare you make *me* clean your list for you?&#8221; And there&#8217;s always the risk that the recipient doesn&#8217;t receive the confirmation email due to a spam filter (same risk as sending DOI confirmations).  There&#8217;s no really easy way around it. It&#8217;s hard work keeping stuff clean (email lists are no exception).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pamela</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-26665</link> <dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:53:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-26665</guid> <description>I wonder if in some cases it would be just as effective to fight spam if, instead of a double opt-in, a subscriber gets an &#039;opt-out email&#039; rather than another opt-in? The email would then only require action if people that receive the email indicate that they have either changed their mind or think that their email address has been submitted without their consent (accidentally or by spammers) to the list.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if in some cases it would be just as effective to fight spam if, instead of a double opt-in, a subscriber gets an &#8216;opt-out email&#8217; rather than another opt-in? The email would then only require action if people that receive the email indicate that they have either changed their mind or think that their email address has been submitted without their consent (accidentally or by spammers) to the list.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Todd Kamin</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-20537</link> <dc:creator>Todd Kamin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:56:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-20537</guid> <description>What about cases like just now where I had to check my SPAM folder for the confirmation email?  I&#039;m using the default confirmation email, too.  Ugh, I just want to collect email addresses for now and I don&#039;t want to require double opt in and I don&#039;t want to implement the API.The cases mentioned in the post above do make a point.  However, I think it&#039;s also shortsighted to always assume a list will get abused as such.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about cases like just now where I had to check my SPAM folder for the confirmation email?  I&#8217;m using the default confirmation email, too.  Ugh, I just want to collect email addresses for now and I don&#8217;t want to require double opt in and I don&#8217;t want to implement the API.</p><p>The cases mentioned in the post above do make a point.  However, I think it&#8217;s also shortsighted to always assume a list will get abused as such.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-19212</link> <dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:02:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-19212</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I agree with Barry. I’m tempted to go find another ESP because i’m more concerned with the unsubscribes I will receive. Usually when someone enters their email its due to an impulse decision they had at that time.&lt;/blockquote&gt;It&#039;s good to be concerned with unsubs, but that&#039;s incorrect terminology here. When you use the double opt-in process, and people don&#039;t confirm, that&#039;s more like a &quot;never did want&quot; than an &quot;unsub.&quot;&lt;blockquote&gt;When you’re in Best Buy, they don’t ask, “Are you sure you want to buy this TV?” right before you walk up to check out.&lt;/blockquote&gt;When you go to pay for that TV with your credit card, they ask for identification in order to protect themselves (and the owner of the credit card) from fraud. That&#039;s a closer analogy to what double opt-in does. It&#039;s to prevent spambots and mischievous people from subscribing email addresses that don&#039;t want to be on the list.&lt;blockquote&gt;If you were to split test the double opt-in process vs the single opt-in process you would see a 30% – 50% unsubscribe rate with the double opt-in.&lt;/blockquote&gt;People who never go through the confirmation process are not &quot;unsubscribing.&quot; They&#039;re people who didn&#039;t want to be on the list anyway.  They&#039;re not truly engaged, and would only cause delivery problems moving forward. This number of 30%-50% is close, but there are also cases where spambots absolutely hammer opt-in forms with dictionary attacks (and many of the fake emails they submit are actually spam traps) in order to submit thousands of emails per minute. Double opt-in helps a lot in this case.&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s not like I can complain since I’m using the Free version but I couldn’t see myself growing into a paid version since there’s no documentation on how to use the single opt-in process.&lt;/blockquote&gt;We listen to feedback from all users, whether you&#039;re free or paid. Single opt-in subscriptions are available through the API, so that it can be integrated with e-commerce systems (I think as Barry suggested) and it&#039;s also available via many integrations out there. Keep in mind it can cause some significant delivery issues if you don&#039;t have proper processes in place to manage your list, so proceed with caution if you decide to go down this path.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I agree with Barry. I’m tempted to go find another ESP because i’m more concerned with the unsubscribes I will receive. Usually when someone enters their email its due to an impulse decision they had at that time.</p></blockquote><p>It&#8217;s good to be concerned with unsubs, but that&#8217;s incorrect terminology here. When you use the double opt-in process, and people don&#8217;t confirm, that&#8217;s more like a &#8220;never did want&#8221; than an &#8220;unsub.&#8221;</p><blockquote><p>When you’re in Best Buy, they don’t ask, “Are you sure you want to buy this TV?” right before you walk up to check out.</p></blockquote><p>When you go to pay for that TV with your credit card, they ask for identification in order to protect themselves (and the owner of the credit card) from fraud. That&#8217;s a closer analogy to what double opt-in does. It&#8217;s to prevent spambots and mischievous people from subscribing email addresses that don&#8217;t want to be on the list.</p><blockquote><p>If you were to split test the double opt-in process vs the single opt-in process you would see a 30% – 50% unsubscribe rate with the double opt-in.</p></blockquote><p>People who never go through the confirmation process are not &#8220;unsubscribing.&#8221; They&#8217;re people who didn&#8217;t want to be on the list anyway.  They&#8217;re not truly engaged, and would only cause delivery problems moving forward. This number of 30%-50% is close, but there are also cases where spambots absolutely hammer opt-in forms with dictionary attacks (and many of the fake emails they submit are actually spam traps) in order to submit thousands of emails per minute. Double opt-in helps a lot in this case.</p><blockquote><p>It’s not like I can complain since I’m using the Free version but I couldn’t see myself growing into a paid version since there’s no documentation on how to use the single opt-in process.</p></blockquote><p>We listen to feedback from all users, whether you&#8217;re free or paid. Single opt-in subscriptions are available through the API, so that it can be integrated with e-commerce systems (I think as Barry suggested) and it&#8217;s also available via many integrations out there. Keep in mind it can cause some significant delivery issues if you don&#8217;t have proper processes in place to manage your list, so proceed with caution if you decide to go down this path.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark Baldwin</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-19207</link> <dc:creator>Mark Baldwin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:59:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-19207</guid> <description>I agree with Barry. I&#039;m tempted to go find another ESP because i&#039;m more concerned with the unsubscribes I will receive. Usually when someone enters their email its due to an impulse decision they had at that time.When you&#039;re in Best Buy, they don&#039;t ask, &quot;Are you sure you want to buy this TV?&quot; right before you walk up to check out.If you were to split test the double opt-in process vs the single opt-in process you would see a 30% - 50% unsubscribe rate with the double opt-in.It&#039;s not like I can complain since I&#039;m using the Free version but I couldn&#039;t see myself growing into a paid version since there&#039;s no documentation on how to use the single opt-in process.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Barry. I&#8217;m tempted to go find another ESP because i&#8217;m more concerned with the unsubscribes I will receive. Usually when someone enters their email its due to an impulse decision they had at that time.</p><p>When you&#8217;re in Best Buy, they don&#8217;t ask, &#8220;Are you sure you want to buy this TV?&#8221; right before you walk up to check out.</p><p>If you were to split test the double opt-in process vs the single opt-in process you would see a 30% &#8211; 50% unsubscribe rate with the double opt-in.</p><p>It&#8217;s not like I can complain since I&#8217;m using the Free version but I couldn&#8217;t see myself growing into a paid version since there&#8217;s no documentation on how to use the single opt-in process.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Barry Mills</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-18234</link> <dc:creator>Barry Mills</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 22:32:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-18234</guid> <description>There are times when double opt in is valuable, but to insist on it all the time devalues Mailchimp badly. There are other times, such as when using an opt-in box during a checkout process (providing it isn&#039;t checked by default) where a double opt in is downright terrible service, it&#039;s just really annoying to the customer. There is no risk of spoofing, no risk of mis-identification, and the customer is carefully answering questions because he is spending money. Ask me if I&#039;d like to sign up at this point by all means, but once I&#039;ve thought about it and said yes, I do NOT want to be asked again 2 minutes later. Despite what Microsoft think, there are questions which really don&#039;t need an &quot;are you sure&quot; stage after they are answered.You already police list quality by warning owners if spam complaints rise above a draconian 0.1%, that should be enough. By all means have double opt-in as a default/recommended setting, but let experienced marketers manage their own lists please, you don&#039;t know best all the time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are times when double opt in is valuable, but to insist on it all the time devalues Mailchimp badly. There are other times, such as when using an opt-in box during a checkout process (providing it isn&#8217;t checked by default) where a double opt in is downright terrible service, it&#8217;s just really annoying to the customer. There is no risk of spoofing, no risk of mis-identification, and the customer is carefully answering questions because he is spending money. Ask me if I&#8217;d like to sign up at this point by all means, but once I&#8217;ve thought about it and said yes, I do NOT want to be asked again 2 minutes later. Despite what Microsoft think, there are questions which really don&#8217;t need an &#8220;are you sure&#8221; stage after they are answered.</p><p>You already police list quality by warning owners if spam complaints rise above a draconian 0.1%, that should be enough. By all means have double opt-in as a default/recommended setting, but let experienced marketers manage their own lists please, you don&#8217;t know best all the time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-4685</link> <dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:50:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-4685</guid> <description>Hi Will, you can mass-unsub people form your list pretty easy in MC. Just go to the lists page, and click the &quot;remove people&quot; link for your list. Then copy-paste the people who unsub&#039;d. Those people can&#039;t be added to *that* list again (unless they double opt-in).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Will, you can mass-unsub people form your list pretty easy in MC. Just go to the lists page, and click the &#8220;remove people&#8221; link for your list. Then copy-paste the people who unsub&#8217;d. Those people can&#8217;t be added to *that* list again (unless they double opt-in).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Will Critchlow</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-4671</link> <dc:creator>Will Critchlow</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:23:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-4671</guid> <description>I had a similar issue on import of addresses from another provider. It would be really good if it were possible to import a list of &#039;unsubscribed&#039; email addresses to mailchimp in order to be able to safely reimport old lists without worrying about adding back in someone who already unsubscribed.Unless I&#039;m mistaken, there is no way to do that is there?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a similar issue on import of addresses from another provider. It would be really good if it were possible to import a list of &#8216;unsubscribed&#8217; email addresses to mailchimp in order to be able to safely reimport old lists without worrying about adding back in someone who already unsubscribed.</p><p>Unless I&#8217;m mistaken, there is no way to do that is there?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MailChimp - Awesome</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-4300</link> <dc:creator>MailChimp - Awesome</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:04:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-4300</guid> <description>[...] your own single opt-in forms, you may do so, but we still don&#039;t recommend single opt-in. Here&#039;s a great example of why we don&#039;t recommend single [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your own single opt-in forms, you may do so, but we still don&#8217;t recommend single opt-in. Here&#8217;s a great example of why we don&#8217;t recommend single [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-346</link> <dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:06:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/prankster-pollutes-obama%e2%80%99s-e-mail-list/#comment-346</guid> <description>Sure thing. I didn&#039;t want to make the blog post too long, so I left out the fact that double opt-in isn&#039;t perfect. We&#039;ve seen spambots automatically submit spam trap emails to double opt-in signup forms over and over again. Then, when the system sends a double opt-in confirmation to the spamtrap address, you&#039;re added to a blacklist. Siiigh. I actually think that&#039;s what was going on with our user in the story above, because the spambots his like clockwork. Luckily, we&#039;ve got some behind-the-scenes measures to combat that, without forcing people into using captchas or anything like that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure thing. I didn&#8217;t want to make the blog post too long, so I left out the fact that double opt-in isn&#8217;t perfect. We&#8217;ve seen spambots automatically submit spam trap emails to double opt-in signup forms over and over again. Then, when the system sends a double opt-in confirmation to the spamtrap address, you&#8217;re added to a blacklist. Siiigh. I actually think that&#8217;s what was going on with our user in the story above, because the spambots his like clockwork. Luckily, we&#8217;ve got some behind-the-scenes measures to combat that, without forcing people into using captchas or anything like that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 306/307 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.mailchimp.com @ 2012-02-09 19:05:41 -->
