<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Can Spammy Keywords HELP Your Spam Score?</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.mailchimp.com/can-spammy-keywords-help-your-spam-score/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/can-spammy-keywords-help-your-spam-score/</link> <description>MailChimp, email marketing, and monkeys!</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/can-spammy-keywords-help-your-spam-score/#comment-3596</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:27:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/2007/04/26/can-spammy-keywords-help-your-spam-score/#comment-3596</guid> <description>You have some good point&#039;s going. Are there sites where i can view what words to use or not in the subject line? I want to be able to improve my metrics.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have some good point&#8217;s going. Are there sites where i can view what words to use or not in the subject line? I want to be able to improve my metrics.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Postini Bug Results in False Spam Reports &#124; MailChimp Blog</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/can-spammy-keywords-help-your-spam-score/#comment-538</link> <dc:creator>Postini Bug Results in False Spam Reports &#124; MailChimp Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 11:13:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/2007/04/26/can-spammy-keywords-help-your-spam-score/#comment-538</guid> <description>[...] been frustrated and bewildered by random Postini blocks ourselves (see here and here). We gave up on trying to contact Postini a while [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been frustrated and bewildered by random Postini blocks ourselves (see here and here). We gave up on trying to contact Postini a while [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/can-spammy-keywords-help-your-spam-score/#comment-108</link> <dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 03:19:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/2007/04/26/can-spammy-keywords-help-your-spam-score/#comment-108</guid> <description>Thanks for the feedback. Honestly though, I don&#039;t think very many people would click to read an article entitled, &quot;Image-weight to text ratio affects deliverability.&quot; The title would be true, but who cares if nobody reads the article.In terms of not providing a definitive answer about getting through Postini, that bugged the hell outta me too. Felt like we left things unfinished.So in a later post, I give a few examples of users&#039; campaigns that actually *did* get through:&lt;a href=&quot;http://mailchimp.blogs.com/2007/05/postini_a_very_.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://mailchimp.blogs.com/2007/05/postini_a_very_.html&lt;/a&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback. Honestly though, I don&#8217;t think very many people would click to read an article entitled, &#8220;Image-weight to text ratio affects deliverability.&#8221; The title would be true, but who cares if nobody reads the article.</p><p>In terms of not providing a definitive answer about getting through Postini, that bugged the hell outta me too. Felt like we left things unfinished.</p><p>So in a later post, I give a few examples of users&#8217; campaigns that actually *did* get through:</p><p><a href="http://mailchimp.blogs.com/2007/05/postini_a_very_.html" rel="nofollow">http://mailchimp.blogs.com/2007/05/postini_a_very_.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/can-spammy-keywords-help-your-spam-score/#comment-107</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 01:21:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/2007/04/26/can-spammy-keywords-help-your-spam-score/#comment-107</guid> <description>I think you should re-write this article tbh. As said in the first comment, it wasn&#039;t the removal of spammy words, it was the text-image ratio. Also, you never gave a reason as to what were the exact reasons it failed in Postini and any suggested solutions. I just felt more confused after reading this article. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you should re-write this article tbh. As said in the first comment, it wasn&#8217;t the removal of spammy words, it was the text-image ratio. Also, you never gave a reason as to what were the exact reasons it failed in Postini and any suggested solutions. I just felt more confused after reading this article.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Seth</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/can-spammy-keywords-help-your-spam-score/#comment-106</link> <dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 22:27:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/2007/04/26/can-spammy-keywords-help-your-spam-score/#comment-106</guid> <description>It was a bit shocking to read that removing spammy words could hurt a spam score. But then I realized by reading the article that it isn&#039;t the removal of the spammy words per se, but reduced ratio of text to image that does it. Reducing spammy words is good, as long as you bulk the text back up so that the text-to-image ratio is equal. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a bit shocking to read that removing spammy words could hurt a spam score. But then I realized by reading the article that it isn&#8217;t the removal of the spammy words per se, but reduced ratio of text to image that does it. Reducing spammy words is good, as long as you bulk the text back up so that the text-to-image ratio is equal.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 251/252 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.mailchimp.com @ 2012-02-09 18:37:32 -->
