<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: A/B testing 2 subject lines</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.mailchimp.com/ab-testing-2-subject-lines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/ab-testing-2-subject-lines/</link> <description>MailChimp, email marketing, and monkeys!</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:36:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ben</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/ab-testing-2-subject-lines/#comment-7995</link> <dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 13:54:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/?p=3038#comment-7995</guid> <description>A/B testing is not available on RSS campaigns. When we built RSS-to-email, it was designed for bloggers who just want another (automated) way to stay in touch with their followers. It&#039;s extremely powerful and useful, but was always seen as a &quot;supplement&quot; to your &quot;normal&quot; email marketing activities. So you&#039;ll notice A/B testing, TimeWarp, etc., is not going to be in the RSS area.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A/B testing is not available on RSS campaigns. When we built RSS-to-email, it was designed for bloggers who just want another (automated) way to stay in touch with their followers. It&#8217;s extremely powerful and useful, but was always seen as a &#8220;supplement&#8221; to your &#8220;normal&#8221; email marketing activities. So you&#8217;ll notice A/B testing, TimeWarp, etc., is not going to be in the RSS area.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Hayes</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/ab-testing-2-subject-lines/#comment-7989</link> <dc:creator>Michael Hayes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 21:14:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/?p=3038#comment-7989</guid> <description>I&#039;d also like to be able to run an A/B test on RSS-generated campaigns (knowing what time of day is best would also be useful).Is it possible?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d also like to be able to run an A/B test on RSS-generated campaigns (knowing what time of day is best would also be useful).</p><p>Is it possible?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Emma McCreary</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/ab-testing-2-subject-lines/#comment-6532</link> <dc:creator>Emma McCreary</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 04:14:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/?p=3038#comment-6532</guid> <description>pretty cool - is it possible to A/B test RSS-generated campaigns? It would be cool to be able to test different subject line formats.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pretty cool &#8211; is it possible to A/B test RSS-generated campaigns? It would be cool to be able to test different subject line formats.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/ab-testing-2-subject-lines/#comment-3561</link> <dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:10:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/?p=3038#comment-3561</guid> <description>Hi Lary, here are my thoughts:* It&#039;s possible a subject line was so spammy, it got spam filtered or bounced back (some spam filters send deceptive bouncebacks to make you clean your list)* I think that no matter what you&#039;re testing, it&#039;s valuable to see all data. You may discover a horrible subject line generated too many unsubs. Or a delivery time got a lot of bouncebacks from busy ISPs.* In terms of the 1.6% difference, yes and no. The difference might&#039;ve been more dramatic if I waited longer than 6 hrs, but like I said, I&#039;m too impatient.  1.6% sounds like a close call, but it can be huge  if your list is large (a difference of hundreds of clicks for some of our users). If you&#039;re an e-retailer, you need every click-to-conversion you can get.Still, if you want complete control, the &quot;manual&quot; option is definitely the way to go.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lary, here are my thoughts:</p><p>* It&#8217;s possible a subject line was so spammy, it got spam filtered or bounced back (some spam filters send deceptive bouncebacks to make you clean your list)</p><p>* I think that no matter what you&#8217;re testing, it&#8217;s valuable to see all data. You may discover a horrible subject line generated too many unsubs. Or a delivery time got a lot of bouncebacks from busy ISPs.</p><p>* In terms of the 1.6% difference, yes and no. The difference might&#8217;ve been more dramatic if I waited longer than 6 hrs, but like I said, I&#8217;m too impatient.  1.6% sounds like a close call, but it can be huge  if your list is large (a difference of hundreds of clicks for some of our users). If you&#8217;re an e-retailer, you need every click-to-conversion you can get.</p><p>Still, if you want complete control, the &#8220;manual&#8221; option is definitely the way to go.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lary Stucker</title><link>http://blog.mailchimp.com/ab-testing-2-subject-lines/#comment-3560</link> <dc:creator>Lary Stucker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:05:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mailchimp.com/?p=3038#comment-3560</guid> <description>Thanks for the nice example of how easy it is to create a/b testing with MailChimp.A couple of thoughts questions:- Other than establish a baseline for your other statistics how does bounce rates have a &quot;winner&quot; and a &quot;losers&quot; in a/b testing.- If you are just testing the subject line isn&#039;t the only metrics worth considering open rates and click-throughs?- With a 1.6% difference in open rates and a dead even click-through rate isn&#039;t the results to statistically close to call a winner?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the nice example of how easy it is to create a/b testing with MailChimp.</p><p>A couple of thoughts questions:</p><p>- Other than establish a baseline for your other statistics how does bounce rates have a &#8220;winner&#8221; and a &#8220;losers&#8221; in a/b testing.</p><p>- If you are just testing the subject line isn&#8217;t the only metrics worth considering open rates and click-throughs?</p><p>- With a 1.6% difference in open rates and a dead even click-through rate isn&#8217;t the results to statistically close to call a winner?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 251/252 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.mailchimp.com @ 2012-02-09 14:38:20 -->
